On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > That seems reasonable since it removes any motivation for > > "investigation" and is likely to be very rare. > > I don't think there is a good way for people to tick a box "prefer not > to tell". Maybe we should work on this angle a bit. I think there's definately something to be said for this. In Qpid's case it's not so much about an unwillingness to reveal it (it is, after all, pretty easy to figure out) but about people not being allowed to make things that could be construed as public statements about the company they're employed by. It's a little weird for us too, it's not something that's normally been an issue in other FOSS projects I've been involved in, but none of those had the same sort of formal structure that the ASF has for projects. - Aidan -- aim/y!:aidans42 g:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/ "We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to each other." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
