J Aaron Farr wrote:
> J Aaron Farr wrote:
>>> git could be an issue.
> > Can you explain what the issue is with Git?
> Leo already gave a decent explanation.
> Basically, it comes down to two aspects:
> 1) infrastructure support
> 2) cultural bias
Only the first one is marginally correct, IMO.
Santiago wrote:
> > 1. You have to use subversion.
> Why? Has been a vote done? where? I vote +1 for git if a vote is still open.
No, there was no vote and is not vote, nor is there any choice. Subversion is
one of the few things that the Board has mandated, imposed on all projects.
Period. Pretty much end of discussion.
No project was allowed to stay with CVS. No project will be allowed to use
another source control system unless it is adopted at the ASF level. Source
code is a critical, shared, public resource maintained by the Foundation, not
something whose storage is managed on a project by project basis. The
Infrastructure Team maintains and protects that shared resource on behalf of
the Foundation.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
