Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>> I would just add that JSR-311 might also be an option.
>> As an aside (and since you folks are on the Expert Group), do we
>> know if JAX-RS will be under a suitable specification license,
>> or has Sun encumbered it as they have other Sun-led specifications?
> We don't know. We won't implement JSR-311 if it isn't open, but at
> this point I wouldn't trust Sun even if they promised a BSD license.
Then why, for crying out loud, are we in the Java Community permitting Sun
to lead any JSRs? We hardly need them for this JSR -- as if Sun are even
remotely subject matter experts -- much less many others. Let's boot Sun
out of the specification process, and return to OPEN Specifications. Surely
Day Software and others are qualified -- more qualified than Sun in fact --
to lead a JAX-RS effort.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
