Felix Meschberger wrote:
> As Alex also pointed out, the goal is to have a flexible framework to
> allow for different bindings.
Ah, that was not clear from the proposal. I thought that you were planning
to define your own, new, component model for delivering the content back to
the requestor. So I am glad that we have had this discussion.
> I would just add that JSR-311 might also be an option.
As an aside (and since you folks are on the Expert Group), do we know if
JAX-RS will be under a suitable specification license, or has Sun encumbered
it as they have other Sun-led specifications?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
