On 1/26/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/25/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hola,
> > I think for a while we used PPMC and (P)PMC interchange-ably. We've
> > more or less standardized on PPMC now, so the docs should probably be
> > updated.
>
> +1
>
> probably needs a little care since some of the older guides use PMC to
> mean IPMC. i'd like each occurance of a term should link into the
> roles document.
>
> > On 1/24/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The PPMC docs ( http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html ) currently
say:
> > >
> > > "Only votes cast by (P)PMC members are binding. If the vote is
> > > positive, the contributor formally becomes an Apache committer. A
> > > (P)PMC member should then follow the documented procedures to complete
> > > the process, but please CC both the Incubator PMC and the PPMC when
> > > sending the necessary e-mails to root."
> > >
> > > What does (P)PMC mean? Should it be replaced with PPMC or PMC?
>
> i suspect that i was trying to be clever (never a wise move)
>
> should be something like 'Either an IPMC or PPMC member should then' etc
So to confirm I have this right...
A PPMC can vote to add a new ASF committer. They don't need a binding
IPMC vote (ie: no mentors, no [EMAIL PROTECTED] people). ?
not sure :-/
i can't see anything definite in policy about it
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
