On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> >
...
>> > The release_notes.txt in the docs folder
>> > of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache
>> > Incubator CXF. This should be fixed :)
>>
>> actually, the branding page [1] says "the podling MUST be referred to as
>> Apache "Podling-Name" AND mention that the project is under Incubation."
>>
>> I don't believe "Incubator" must be in the actual name as long as
>> mention of incubation is made. Right?
>
> that's how i read that document too
>
> but on the normative
>
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Podling+Constraints
>
> there is:
>
> "Should the Incubator PMC, in accordance with these guidelines vote to
> approve the request, the Podling MAY perform the release under the
> following constraints :
>
> * the release archive MUST contain the word "incubating" in the
> filename; and
> * the release archive MUST contain an Incubation disclaimer (as
> described in the previous section), clearly visible in the main
> documentation or README file."
>
> since it's policy, it is a blocker
I think cxf is ok -- their file has "incubating" in the name (I
downloaded cxf-2.0-incubator-M1.tar.gz). After I unpacked it, the
DISCLAIMER at the top level has the standard incubator disclaimer, and
the README at the top level also includes the incubator disclaimer.
What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should probably
include the incubator disclaimer.
thanks for the catch: i was very, very wrong.
...need sleep...
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
