Hi Upayavira, On Nov 21, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Upayavira wrote:
Patrick Linskey wrote:...snipped...However, I *would* like clear guidance about what to do. Is this goingto cause problems with incubator approval of the 0.9.6 vote that's currently running on the OpenJPA mailing list?In the end, all you _NEED_ to do is what you are doing. Make a tgz, with a specific version. Make it available here. Start a vote.
Done that.
What I'm talking about is more at the level of convenience. You are right that 1.9.6 hasn't been released. But a vote has taken place for it. Starting another vote for the same release number could make it harder for us to differentiate between the two vote threads.You could simply do [VOTE] 2nd vote for 0.9.6. That would successfully differentiate the vote.
Yeah, that's what Marc has done. The subject line for the current vote is: [VOTE][THIRD ATTEMPT] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release
Should be clear enough that this is the THIRD, yes, THIRD ATTEMPT. Don't know why all the yelling but bygones. ;-)
Craig
That's all I'm _asking_ for (not demanding). HTH. Regards, Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
