On 11/9/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When infrastructure votes to maintain it for as long as the projects wish to use it, then it is infrastructure. Right now, Confluence is just an experiment and we made that abundantly clear. The first two people who promised to maintain it disappeared immediately after setup. One new person is not sufficient to maintain anything, even though the effort is appreciated.
Yes, and as soon as we realized those volunteers were MIA, three others stepped up to take their place, all of us Members with several years of experience at the ASF.
To be maintainable, it must be possible for the entire team to maintain the working instance. That means documenting what to do when it breaks, preferably somewhere that is accessible when it happens to be broken (like under the infrastructure subversion).
* http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ This page is served by HTTPD, not Confluence. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
