I understand that (now). Different approaches to the same problem.
Variety is good. However, where we have issue is in the definition of
"earning" I suppose: being on the initial committers list when the
proposal was formed was supposed to be good enough. Turns out it
wasn't. It only took 2 months for us to figure that one out.
Mark.
On 2 Oct 2006, at 18:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Mark Little wrote:
That kind of depends what you're used to now doesn't it? In some
circles really getting involved actively can best be done (can
only be done) with committer rights.
That's not how the ASF works or has ever worked. It's for
this exact reason why there is confusion and discussion
(still) about commit privs for podlings... commit privs
have always been a relatively high bar for people to
meet, but one that we've *always* had open for
people. We don't "blacklist" people from commit
privs because they work for a specific company
or because the don't work for a specific company,
for example. If you earn it, you get it.
The thing with podlings is that what's meant by
"earning" it is much lower... it should still
exist, however.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
