Robert, Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the release later today, based on your comments.
regards, John Kaputin., On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes, > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > The six +1 votes were from: > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > Arthur Ryman > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > Oshani Seneviratne > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > John Kaputin > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is rerolled. a few notes: this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should definitely include a source distribution. the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you get into the habit now. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
