I have not yet had any response to the second VOTE request after I re-rolled the Woden M6 release files. This is becoming urgent as the M6 release is required for upcoming the Axis2 1.1 release, so this is a gentle reminder for any Incubator PMC members from Apache WS.
There were two binding +1 votes from the first VOTE request. Are these still valid for the re-rolled release candidate or do I need to start again and get three +1 binding votes for the re-rolled release. regards, John Kaputin. On 10/3/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback from the Incubator PMC. The jar files now have LICENSE and NOTICE files in their meta-inf directories. The release now includes a source code distribution as well as a binary distribution. The archive files names now begin with apache-woden-incubating-1.0.0M6* The archives now unpack to the top-level directory name woden-incubating-1.0.0M6 The files for this release are now located in a private directory at [3] and the previous M6 release files have been removed from /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. Please vote by 5pm EST, Wednesday October 4th 2006. [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ [3] Release files are in directory /home/jkaputin/wodenM6 at people.apache.org Thanks, John Kaputin On 9/29/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Robert, > Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the > release later today, based on your comments. > > regards, > John Kaputin., > > On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal > > to > > > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 > > votes, > > > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. > > The > > > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > > > > > The six +1 votes were from: > > > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > > > Arthur Ryman > > > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > > > Oshani Seneviratne > > > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > > > John Kaputin > > > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > publish > > > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > > > woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE > > files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are > > distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden > > plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to > > have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is > > rerolled. > > > > a few notes: > > > > this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should > > definitely include a source distribution. > > > > the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command > > is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the > > release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. > > > > apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for > > example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how > > strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you > > get into the habit now. > > > > - robert > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
