As the champion for JINI, I suppose it behooves me to try and get this untangled.
I'm not a Jini expert, but my understanding is that it is it's own spec ecosystem. Therefore, I'm against having one project doing software implementation that is called "Jini", just as I'd be against projects like "Apache JCP", "Apache W3C", "Apache OASIS", "Apache ECMA" etc. However, we do have a chance here to host the governance and spec process for JINI. Therefore, I'd like to propose that we create two podlings, one for JINI governance, and one for building the implementation and community around the working code that has been proposed. Comments? geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]