On 30/07/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal?
Cliff, yes I do. As you may have seen from previous posts I've only just been catching up with this. My concern is that it is not appropriate for the incubator to continue to condone a practice which at best raises certain moral questions, and at worst can be seen as exploitative and often goes against the wishes of the communities it affects. The fact that Glaswegians may not feel particularly exploited, or that there is a precedent for proper nouns to be used for project names should not matter. What should concern the incubator is, as Robert said, continuous improvement. Please would you at least think about re-considering the name and trying to come up with a proposal which isn't also a proper noun? d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
