Gwyn Evans wrote: > That's the Wicket side of it - anyone have any idea about how long the > incubation period might be expected to take?
Personally, my take on it is that the administrative side of things should be resolvable pretty quickly - collecting CLAs, reviewing licenses - also the process of Incubator PMC members observing how the Wicket community operates, all of that can IMO happen quite quickly. The thing that really will take a bit more time is simply both sides getting to know each other - forming those human relationships. After all, that is what holds an organisation like the ASF together in the end. As to how long that process might take, whilst I'm pretty sure it'll be on the quicker end of the scale, I'm not really that sure how long it will be - to some extent it depends upon what comes up during the process. Does anyone here have an idea what the shortest time is that a new community might be incubated (assuming no other issues)? Regards, Upayavira > On 29/07/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Time scale for Wicket 2.0 is to start out releasing betas within two >> months. We plan to finish Wicket In Action the next few months - say >> october - and we really want the 2.0 API stabilized by then, as we're >> covering 2.0. The major changes we had in mind for 2.0 have been in >> for a few months now, and as we have converted all the core >> components/ projects, and most of the wicket-stuff projects, we have >> good proof everything works (really) well. We are currently discussing >> the last API tweaks, most notably Wicket's models, but once that is >> done and proven, we are ready for beta. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
