+1
Guillaume
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Ah. I got confused between the API and the IMPL. Sure, we have talked
about it before, maybe this will generate the momentum :) +1 to a java
spec project.
thanks,
dims
On 6/7/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed - I think a shared java spec project makes sense where we can
unify stuff across all projects like jaxb, geronimo-spec, harmony,
servicemix (we've got the JBI API) into one place.
On 6/7/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a thread about a java spec central repository back in
december.
> I wish it exists as it would be the best location...
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is possibly OT, so I apologize in advance. A while ago there
has
> > been a discussion around a separate project for specifications on
this
> > list, which grew into nothing. Currently I am on the way to
publish a
> > clean room implementation of the JAXB 2.0 API. There are no IP
issues:
> > It is based on the jaxme-api (clean room JAXB 1.0 API), written
by me,
> > an existing committer and, as of yet, unpublished.
> >
> > However, the question arises: What would be a possible target
project?
> > I could imagine geronimo-specs (the API will be a part of J2EE 1.5),
> > harmony (the API will be a part of a future J2SE release), ws
commons,
> > or again JaxMe.
> >
> > Jochen
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
