Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to
reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ'
Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
I've found some information on the STATUS file but I think I'm missing
something because I can find info about the HTML status file, but
nothing on the STATUS file checked into the Subversion repo. I'm
trying to understand the redundancy and your query about
appropriateness. Below is what I have found:
FWIW, you might find helpful the issues below and the threads they
reference: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-5, and
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-7.
My understanding is that only one "STATUS file" is required and
that's your project's status web page; the term "STATUS file" is
a holdover from the early days of the incubator when a file with
that name did in fact exist and was required.
Martin
• The Incubator Process Description page states that with an upcoming
assessment it is generally a good idea to have your STATUS file right
up to-date
(http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html#Review).
• The Incubation Policy page states that every project has an
incubation status file under
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/projectname.html
(http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Use+of+Apache+Resources).
Could you point out the docs on the difference between the two and the
appropriateness of the STATUS file?
Thanks!
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
