On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan/James dredged up a thought process which i want to ask all of you > about. > > For a concrete example, I know for a fact that WADI, ActiveIO and > Trifork guys have been talking about coming up with a single framework > for IO. James hinted in a prev message and there have been some > references in emails on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list[1] and no traffic on > activemq list (as far as i can tell)
Thats kinda the point - as up to now most of this code has not been part of Geronimo and so wouldn't have been discussed on the Geronimo lists. Once all the code has made it to the incubator, then we can start discussing this on the Geronimo list but right now there have not been any discussions and AFAIK is no action plan - these things have so far only come to light when meeting in person at ApacheCon & other conferences and realising that there's lots of things we could do to consodiate code within the Geronimo family of projects - once they are all at Geronimo. The incuabtion of OpenEJB and WADI is progressing and we'll be able to tackle this soon - but rest assured it will happen on the Geronimo lists. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
