Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Craig McClanahan wrote: > >>My understanding of the incubator process is that the Incubator PMC still >>has to vote to accept a podling > > No. Although some people have expressed a desire that it be otherwise, at > this time, the Incubator PMC does not second-guess another PMC's decision to > bring a project to the Incubator. The Incubator PMC does have the sole > binding vote on projects graduating from the Incubator. > > FWIW, we've recently had some fairly lengthy threads discussing the topic.
The wording in http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+of+Proposal+by+Sponsor could be improved, specifically these sentences: > Upon a successful result, the Sponsor SHOULD request the Incubator PMC take > on the Candidate as a new Podling. > ... > The Incubator PMC MAY immediately accept the Candidate, or may (at the > discretion of the Incubator PMC) require a successful VOTE by the Incubator > PMC. > > The nominated Mentors MAY be immediately accepted by the Incubator PMC. > However the Incubator PMC MAY also suggest replacement Mentors. The Incubator > PMC has the final choice of Mentors. How should this be changed? (And I'll be happy to update the docs.) -jean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
