Jean T. Anderson wrote:
[...]
it should be public vote, so on the public -dev list. Here's a
suggested refinement:
"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list and notify
the Podling's PPMC list that the vote has been called.
Hmm. This is different from what stdcxx has been practicing (we
never notified our PPMC since all PPMC members are committers and
the active ones participate on -dev). What would be the purpose
of this notification? OTOH, I could see that it might be important
for a podling to notify a sponsoring TLP's PMC. My understanding
is that only podlings on the TLP track have a PPMC and all others
use their sponsoring TLP project's PMC. Isn't that correct?
At least three +1
votes are required (see guidelines at
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html), and only the PPMC member
votes are binding.
IMO, the PPMC/committer question needs to be clarified. In fact,
if my understanding about TLPs and PMC/PPMCs is correct, this
could not be correct.
Without clarifying this I wouldn't know whose votes to count :)
Martin
If the majority of all votes is positive, then send a
summary of that vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and formally request the
Incubator PMC approve such a release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are
required."
thanks for all the careful feedback,
-jean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
