On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:28:51AM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Folks, > > Let's VOTE for the following changes to incubator processes (majority > rules, no vetos). Anyone can vote, but only the PMC member vote's are > binding. If you want to bring up an issue, PLEASE DON'T hijack this > thread, but start a new one. As usual use +1/+0/-0/-1 notation.
Per my email from before. > [ ] - Any proposal should hit [EMAIL PROTECTED] first, No PR before that. +1. > [ ] - Any PR should be vetted by PRC, No Excuses. +1. > [ ] - Any new proposal should have 3 ASF Members / Officers as mentors > (without regard to affiliation) -1. > [ ] - Any new proposal should list at least one person as a > infrastucture volunteer. -1. > [ ] - A sponsoring PMC should hold their VOTE to sponsor a proposal or > IP Clearance 72 hours *AFTER* it is posted on [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1. > [ ] - Any existing committer from any Apache project should be able to > volunteer to work on the proposed project within the 72 hours. Any > later, it would be through regular karma process. (To promote > inclusion/diversification from day one) +1. > [ ] - IP Clearance needs to be preceded by a proposal posted to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well -1. > [ ] - IP Clearance has to be OK'ed by Incubator PMC VOTE (before code > gets checked in to a sponsoring project's SVN) +1. > [ ] - Petition the Board to require Incubator PMC VOTE to begin > incubation process even for projects that other PMC's want to sponsor. -1. > [ ] - Within 72 hours of a new project hitting the [EMAIL PROTECTED] > mailing list, that any incubator PMC member can call for an advisory > vote and comment period if they see issues with what's been presented > by the sponsoring PMC. +1. (Noting that it can't block the incubation, but only use it to raise issues to make sure everything is in order.) -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
