On Sunday 08 January 2006 15:15, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I don't see it. If you think this is under incubation, then you need > to start by creating a status page that reflects the actual resources > being requested and by whom. After that, I suggest you find out the > actual list of committers.
Does this means that we are likely to see some increased requirements for projects to enter incubation?? * Multiple mentors? * +1 vote indicating true commitment of resources? * Limited number of podlings under one's mentorship? * Multiple instances of approval? * Stronger ties within the ASF? * Lesser ties with commercial interests? * Bigger differentiation of podlings initial entry point? Personally, I think something is required to change, and especially about mentorship. Some projects under incubation has good mentors, in others they seem fairly 'quiet' and sometimes other people are providing the actual mentoring. Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]