Well, I didn't argument against using the incubator infrastructure. Nobody seemed too interested here, though (in contradiction to the MyFaces community, who was very interested), that's why Ted probably thought about going through the MyFaces sandbox directly as a code grant is already in place and the licensing issue is very clear.
No problem at all for going through a separate incubator SVN - Ted ? and thanks for at least some feedback to this proposal ;) regards, Martin On 9/6/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2005 03:51, Ted Husted wrote: > > > Once the software grant is on file, for simplicity, we can post the code > > to the "sandbox" area of the MyFaces repository, but mark it as being > > under incubation. > > When MerlinStudio was brought into Avalon, the codebase went via the Incubator > SVN, and we had no choice about that. Moving things around in SVN is easy, so > there is no real argument against it. > > > We' can do the usual page on the incubator site, tracking our progress > > This part is not optional. > > s/can/will/ > > > The above mentioned MerlinStudio had a very similar situation to Tobago, and > travelled thru the incubator in something like 2 weeks, including the removal > of a Hibernate dependency, so play the Incubator cards nicely and you are out > of here faster than this thread of discussion :o) > > Cheers > Niclas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
