-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > Anyways, I'll desist on this if it doesn't seem like there's convergence > towards something. Like many conversations in the ASF these days the > responses strike me more as "here's where you're wrong" rather than a > constructive discussion, to which I feel compelled to respond > point-by-point (trying to find middle grounds), and I don't have the > energy to campaign for something that just seemed like a simple oversight.
sorry if i, at least, have come across this way. let me restate my personal position: i'm fine with 'show us the code before acceptance' being a strong *recommendation*, but not with it being a requirement. and i think the decision about whether or not the code needs to be seen first should be left up to the incubator pmc. i don't like ndas on principle, and hope they can be avoided. however, if the incubator pmc thinks that's the way to go for a particular proposal, i think it's their call. (although i don't promise not to lobby against it. ;-) - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQPVaNprNPMCpn3XdAQG3BwP/ZkdWpubZVHa1+N0SeeIlWzwaGMx3XUmt NnJ93DDd+cEx1SG8UJJ/wy5vqV29V0oM+FVVfX23TAWI5gCtI40xSKkEQmXJuBMM aC/yiVE29A5DkV1Wb71ZgDlc9eXqnZx9DSdo0ITvZ5P4iKcJoDW4+6pmjsNltam1 YvbknT4yI6E= =9eWV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
