On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 03:23, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 12:20, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > >>The "Incubator Reorg" threads have brought the Incubator to the > >>definition of a new set of rules, that aim to simplify, streamline and > >>generally make the process of incubation more effective. > >> > >>It's time to wrap it up. Hence I ask to vote on the acceptance of this > >>scope definition, which is the start of our charter, and on the proposed > >>line of action, specifically on the project spinoffs and on the creation > >>of PPMCs. > >> > >>My Vote: +1 > > > > What's the time frame for the vote? My response to the proposal is > > lengthy so would a span of a week from now be reasonable? > > There has been a RT, then a PROPOSAL, and after much more than one week, > a vote. It's a bit late to reply, isn't it?
I would expect that it isn't given the impact the proposal could have it accepted. > In any case, you are free to post anything at any time, but this vote > will of course go on (and yes, it will last more than a couple of days, > being so important). > > In any case, if the vote is positive, we can start using the new rules > and continue discussing your proposal as a next step. No, I would ask that you don't continue as my vote will not be positive and at the very least I would like to spend a couple days finishing my response. I have no idea what the voting procedures are or what my vote actually counts for it at all but it's tentatively -1. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
