>>> 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
>>> accountable for their decision.
> > We are not deciding on the name but on the need or not to have a name
> > change. In case for a name change, this will surely be the case.
> At which point, they will be autonomous until the Incubator PMC decides
> that the new name offends somebody.

That should not happen, because the "PPMC" (or whatever name it goes by)
will BE the Incubator PMC, along with the other relevant parties.  That is
the whole point of the restructuring of "umbrella" PMCs.

> I would very much prefer that this be turned around.  Instead of the
> incubator PMC voting on and taking responsibility for rejecting the
> name Geronimo, establish a PPMC and have the concerned individuals
> make their case to the people who are empowered to make that decision.

That is my proposal, as well, although it may come out differently because
it may be that I see the "PPMC" differently than you do.

In any event, I would table this to be resolved by the Geronimo
what-ever-we-call-this-thing-currently-labelled-PPMC.

        --- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to