"Brian Behlendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Despite this, I like Geronimo as a name. However, I think it'd be a poor
> choice for two reasons previously noted: other software products already
> using that name, and the *potential* it has to cause quite a bit of
> trouble.  It's really not that hard to come up with new names.

If other software products already have this name then IMO its
poor form for us to hijack it. Given Apache's brand value its probably
possible, but that doesn't mean its right.

+1 for changing it.

Sanjiva.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to