From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Not necessarily. Put it in the website CVS linking it from the drafts section and add a <warning> part on top so that it's clear that it's a WIP.
Sounds like a good compromise. I will do this.
However - fair warning - I am going to be a pest and keep niggling to move it from Draft to formal :>.
That's exactly my idea :->
In any case, Berin, you can use the *.cwiki format for that file, so it's easier to understand the diffs (actually all normative docs should be like that IMHO because of this).
Have already translated to standard Forrest, so if it's OK might just add as that?
Sure :-)
NOTE: I do not personally see this as normative, and have marked the page as such. I am separately creating a cut down "Policy" document that should (I believe) be the normative reference.
By stating there is only one Normative reference,
and making sure it is as lean and clean as
possible, I believe we can save arguments down the track.
See :
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?IncubatorPolicyDraft
for an *embryonic* version of the normative document.
This is the one I was suggesting should actually have a formal vote, as this is the one that people will point to and say "here is what you have to do".
Good.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
