...So we're yack yacking about the incubator (again). The incubator AFAICT replicated a tricameral vote. To release you must have:
The point? None, I just like pointing my finger childishly when someone does something silly (like create a tricameral voting system... pretty funny, spell check doesn't recognize it, though it finds bicameral)...
Tricameral vote means that three entities have to vote for the same thing AFAIK, and this is not the case here.
The votes have different meanings, and AFAIK we need only two:
1 - someone at Apache votes to have the project come to Apache
(a PMC or the board)
2 - the Incubator votes to spin it off after incubationI don't see the problem here, we are talking about two *distinct* responsibilities.
If you refer to the previous "three parties vote simultaneously", I can only agree that it sucks big time. That's why we are opting for a system that clearly states that the one responsible for the thing gets the say.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
