So we're yack yacking about the incubator (again). The incubator AFAICT replicated a tricameral vote. To release you must have:
1. A PMC vote to accept it 2. The committers of the project vote that they're ready to leave 3. The incubator PMC vote to let them out. The only country that ever invested significantly in such a system was Poland (other examples exist but the other bodies are subservient and generally advise more than consent). This was *one* of the times it was wiped off the map. I would suppose #2 would the be the most vested group and #1 be the second most (substituted for the board in the top level situation)... I'd suppose #3 would be the least vested group. The point? None, I just like pointing my finger childishly when someone does something silly (like create a tricameral voting system... pretty funny, spell check doesn't recognize it, though it finds bicameral)... -Andy -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
