> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 6:16 AM
> I see. but here's one question. Does this "meritocracy" > encourage the inactive *ASF members* into the retirement status > or hibernation status? This is something for the ASF membership to worry about. IMO, inactiveness deserves a definition. > Also, I assume that all the ASF members have signed the "new" CLA > as a matter of course ... is this true? > >>> Here is a gooooood stats on this ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mailing list. >> : >>> Hope this helps :-) >> not really, at least not for me, since i don't know what point >> you're trying to make.. > > Eheh, > > I should have put that on the threads of > "[VOTE] dims for incubator PMC" > or > "[VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)" > ... :-) No, you shouldn't have. Stats are considered more damaging than doing good. Please do not post stats. > Also, I will make use of this stats in > "Please make me a committer of Incubator Project: incubator-site" > campaign :-) I advise you not to do that. Sander --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
