On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 08:54 pm, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The only disagreement is - should all this dynamically generated stuff
go into CVS or not. It seems silly to put it into CVS - since its
trivial to regenerate the site at any point using Maven. Its worse than
saying lets check every version of a jar into CVS.
One of the reasons for putting dynamically generated artifacts into CVS is
that in the event of a recovery situation, CVS is on one server, and the web
sites are on another, so recovery can be relatively quick. It is
unreasonable to assume that the infrastructure team has the tools, expertise
or time to use each different publishing engine.
But the developers on the projects can easily do this for them? It takes about 5 minutes to completely redeploy the website. Is that too long?
James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
