"Jeff Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > FWIW, here's my +1 for Incubatorship. I see Lenya as tackling all the > problems that Forrest would eventually encounter, if we ignored the > blatant scope creep. It would be very cool if Lenya and Forrest were > eventually two different 'profiles' of a common technology set.
hi, i think forrest may turn out to be a wonderful "immediate value" publication for lenya. we have been looking at ways to lower the entry barriers into lenya, and having a well-supported publication that works out of the box would be very sweet. i saw some discussion recently about how to make documentation tasks easier. maybe we can help with the browser-based xml editors we integrated into lenya: www.bitfluxeditor.org (mozilla only) www.xopus.org (ie, mozilla mostly working, waiting on xpath fixes in moz) it would be (relatively) easy to make these editors ready for xdocs. disclaimer: i havent looked into forrest deeper than a cursory glance :) there is certainly a lot of scope for collaboration, and both could be part of stefanos "xml content editing" stack. -gregor -- Gregor J. Rothfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] CMS conferences, interop, advocacy, projects http://oscom.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
