You seem to be concerned that the software is *used* in productive environments.
Do software developers who want to change the code have to take that into account? Yes, certainly they should do that.
Is that an argument against the adoption of the software? No, quite the opposite.
No, I'm happy to see it in active use. I fear however that heavy (backward-incompatible) redesign and rearchitecturing will be hindered by the existing installations. Again, this is just thinking out aloud.
I find the overall reaction to this proposal to be only lukewarm. This is worrying me even more.
Thanks for this open discussion.
</Steven> -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
