Hi, >>> Sure, but I don't understand the "virtual" thing. If you are going to >>> call something "virtual" I think you need to explain the reasoning. >> >> The reasoning is that an existing RFC is read-only. Therefore, the "actual" >> ToC >> of RFC7252 doesn't change as a result of this update. >> However, its "virtual" ToC does.
The text in the existing RFC section 12.3 is also read-only, so shouldn't the modified text section 12.3 then also be "virtual"? :) Anyway, it's a minor thing, so I will let IESG decide what/if to do. You have addressed my main issues. Thank You! :) Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
