Hi, Christer, Thanks very much for your review and the suggested restyle.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 17:02, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Nits/editorial comments: > > It is a little confusing when the updates to RFC 7252 are in the IANA > Considerations section of the document. In addition, new procedures are added > in Sections 5.1 and 5.2, but those should be new 12.3 subsections in RFC 7252. > > I suggest to have a dedicated "Updates to RFC 7252" section, where the text in > Sections 5.1 and Sections 5.2 are also added as new Sections 12.3.1 and > Sections 12.3.2 to RFC 7252. > > For example: > > ---- > > 4. Updates to RFC 7252 > > This Section updates Section 12.3, and adds the new Sections 12.3.1 and > 12.3.2, > to [RFC7252]. > > 4.1. Updates to Section 12.3 > > // The text in Section 5 > > 4.2. New Section 12.3.1 > > // The text in Section 5.1 > > 4.2. New Section 12.3.2 > > // The text in Section 5.2 > > ---- > > The Security Considerations then become Section 5. The IANA Considerations > become Section 6, and there you only need to state something like: > > "This document updates the IANA procedures of [RFC7252] for registering CoAP > Content-Formats." Where would §5.3 (Expert Review Procedure) and §5.4 (Preferred Format for the Content Type Field) go? cheers, thanks! t _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
