Hi Paul,
Apologies, I think this nit got neglected along the way.

> 1) NIT: Inconsistency
>
> In Figure 3, a Fault gives rise to an Alert, that gives rise to an Alarm.
>
> In Figure 4, a Problem directly gives rise to an Alarm, with no 
> intermediary Alert.
>
> Is this inconsistency intended? If so, it could be helpful to explain it.

Thanks, you have dug up something in figures that pre-date the finalising of 
the text definitions.

Indeed, Figure 4 should show that an Alarm can give rise to an Alert. (And the 
text should show that, too.)

Now, it *is* intentional that a Fault gives rise to an Alert, while a Problem 
gives rise to an Alarm.

This is because a Fault is Event-based, while a Problem is State-based. That is 
(IMHO) adequately captured in the definitions.

Cheers,
Adrian


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to