> On Dec 5, 2024, at 10:51 AM, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > > >> On Dec 2, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Russ, >> >> Thanks for the review. >> >>> On Dec 2, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Russ Housley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org >>> <mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Reviewer: Russ Housley >>> Review result: Almost Ready >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >>> like any other last call comments. >>> >>> For more information, please see the FAQ at >>> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ >>> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>>. >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-14 >>> Reviewer: Russ Housley >>> Review Date: 2024-12-02 >>> IETF LC End Date: 2024-12-09 >>> IESG Telechat date: Unknown >>> >>> >>> Summary: Almost Ready >>> >>> >>> Major Concerns: None >>> >>> >>> Minor Concerns: >>> >>> Section 7: The text says: >>> >>> ... These protocols have to use a >>> secure transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC >>> [RFC9000]) and have to use mutual authentication. >>> >>> I assume that NETCONF and RESTCONF REQUIRE a secure transport and mutual >>> authentication. Is that correct? If so, can this be written in a way >>> that makes it clear that these other protocols already impose these >>> requirements? >> >> Yes, NETCONF and RESTCONF require a secure transport, which are satisfied by >> NETCONF using SSH, and RESTCONF using TLS/QUIC. Not sure of the statement >> “these other protocols already impose those requirements”. Can you clarify? > > I think it would be more clear to say something like: > > ... NETCONF and RESTCONF require the use a > secure transport layer such as SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], or QUIC > [RFC9000]. NETCONF and RESTCONFalso require mutual authentication.
Ok. I will let the authors decide if they want to make this editorial change. Note, this text comes from a template that was discussed and agreed upon on the netmod mailing list. It will require the authors to go back to the WG to agree on the updated text. Thanks. > > Russ > > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
