Ines, thanks for your review. Balázs, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Feb 11, 2021, at 6:24 AM, Ines Robles > <mariainesrobles=40googlemail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi Balázs, > > Thank you for your clarifications. It is Ok for me. > > BR, > Ines > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:46 PM Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.va...@ericsson.com > <mailto:balazs.a.va...@ericsson.com>> wrote: > Hi Ines, > Many thanks for your review. > See my reactions and proposed updates below. > Thanks > Bala'zs > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ines Robles via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org > <mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> > Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2021 12:57 AM > To: gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org> > Cc: det...@ietf.org <mailto:det...@ietf.org>; > draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn....@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn....@ietf.org>; last-c...@ietf.org > <mailto:last-c...@ietf.org> > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05 > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. > > Document: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05 > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review Date: 2021-02-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05 > IESG Telechat date: 2021-02-18 > > Summary: > > This document specifies the Deterministic Networking MPLS data plane when > operating over a TSN sub-network. > > I have some minor questions to the authors. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > - Page 5: Could you please describe what the "TSN treatment" comprise? > > <Bala'zs> TSN treatment means to execute TSN functionalities during > forwarding. I will extend the text > OLD TEXT: > ... All these functions have to identify flows those > require TSN treatment. > NEW TEXT: > ... All these functions have to identify flows those > require TSN treatment (i.e., applying TSN functions > during forwarding). > END > > - Are the security considerations the same for TSN-unaware that are for > TSN-aware nodes? - How are the privacy considerations for those? It would be > nice to mention explicitly how or where (I-D.ietf-detnet-security???) the > privacy considerations are addressed for TSN-unaware and TSN-aware nodes > > <Bala'zs> The I-D.ietf-detnet-security contains DetNet specific security > considerations. TSN-unaware nodes are out-of-scope in the draft. TSN-aware > nodes are part of both the MPLS and the TSN domain, where both domain has its > own security considerations, which must be applied. > > Thank you for this document > > Ines. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
