Paul, thanks for your review. Balázs, thanks for the updates. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:45 PM, Balázs Varga A > <balazs.a.varga=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > Many thanks for your review. I will update the next version with the nits. > Thanks > Bala'zs > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 6:20 PM > To: draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn....@ietf.org > Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org> > Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-05 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-05 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2021-02-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05 > IESG Telechat date: ? > > Summary: > > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. > > General: > > I'm unqualified to meaningfully comment on the technical quality of this > document. I've reviewed it for form. > > Issues: > > Major: 0 > Minor: 0 > Nits: 2 > > 1) NIT: Unlinked references > > In section 1 paragraph 2, and section 3 paragraph 1, there are references to > [RFC8939] that are not linked. > > 2) NIT: From IdNits > > IdNits reports: > > == Outdated reference: A later version (-14) exists of > draft-ietf-detnet-security-12 > > There are a couple of other warnings, but they are spurious. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
