Thank you for your reviews! I will verify that those nits are fixed in the next version of the draft.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:39 AM Alissa Cooper <ali...@cooperw.in> wrote: > Vijay, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. > > Alissa > > > > On Sep 18, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-cose-x509-07 > > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > > Review Date: 2020-09-18 > > IETF LC End Date: 2020-10-01 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: Ready for publication with nits. > > > > Major issues: 0 > > > > Minor issues: 0 > > > > Nits/editorial comments: 5 > > > > (Sn refers to Section n) > > - S1: s/ad decided/and decided/ > > - S1: s/Since that time a/Since that time, a/ > > - S1: s/in the 6TiSCH environment [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap], > > describes/in the 6TiSCH environment, [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap] > > describes/ - S1: "A third scenario..." The wording seemed odd since > there is no > > text that sets the expectation that there will be three scenarios for > > discussion. If your intent is to enumerate the different scenarios, > probably > > best to prepare the reader for this ahead of time. - S2: s/which it can > then > > provide to/that it subsequently provides to/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > Gen-art@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
