Hi Paul,

Regarding the reference to RFC 4572, the new text in section 10.2.1 references 
RFC 4572. We earlier agreed we were not going to update that text, and keep an 
informative reference to RFC 4572.

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 29 July 2017 01:07
To: Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Cc: General Area Review Team <[email protected]>; IETF MMUSIC WG 
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27

Hi Paul,

Thanks for the review. I'll fix references.

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 28 July 2017 04:01
To: [email protected]
Cc: General Area Review Team <[email protected]>; IETF MMUSIC WG 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before 
posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2017-07-07
IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-24
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-15

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be 
fixed before publication.

(These nits were reported by IdNits. I apologize for not noticing these during 
my Last Call review.)

Issues:

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  2

(1) NIT: Unused Reference: 'RFC5245' is defined on line 1065, but no explicit 
reference was found in the text

This is now redundant because all the references in the text have been changed 
to draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis.

(2) NIT: Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4572

This is now obsolete because it has been replaced by RFC8122. This draft should 
now be referencing that.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to