> On Mar 16, 2017, at 20:43, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review 
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the 
> IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call 
> comments.
> For more information, please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>  
>  
> Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2017-03-16
> IETF LC End Date:   2017-03-20
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-04-13
>  
>  
> Summary:
> This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have 
> comments.

Harald and I (the shepherd) thank you for your review.

> Major issues:
> Minor issues:
> Nits/editorial comments:
> -[Page 3] "an other hardware has"---->"and other hardware have”
fixed
> -[Page 4], the word "subprotocol" was not clear to me. Would it be possible 
> to add in parenthesis a few example for protocol and subprotocol?
Mostly talking about Websockets-related sub-protocols. XMPP and SIP are 
examples noted later. 
> -[Page 4], "an WebRTC"--->""a WebRTC”
fixed
> -[Page 7], "Interactive Connectivty"--->"Interactive Connectivity”
fixed
> -General: please spell out acronyms at first use
I caught a couple, but I’m sure I missed some.  I figured I let some go like 
“SDP Agent” in the terminology section because people can just as easily go 
there.  There’s also a lot in the RFC acronym list that don’t necessarily need 
to be expanded.
> -General: the writing (or perhaps lack of punctuation) in this draft made it 
> hard to read. Please consider reviewing it especially if the draft is 
> intended as Standards Track.
I’m going to leave this one to the RFC editor.  Every time I try to make 
something sound better they just do a better job.

PR can be found here:
https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/rtcweb-overview/pull/13/

spt
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to