Hello Jari The suggested changes were made and reviewed by AD and the chairs
Thanks Suhas Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:35 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the review, Meral!! > > Authors, have you see the suggested editorial changes? Wanted to make sure > they are not missed. > > Jari > >> On 22 Feb 2016, at 20:19, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review >> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for >> the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call >> comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05 >> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >> Review Date: 2016-02-22 >> IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-26 >> IESG Telechat date: NA >> >> Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I >> have some comments. >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> -[Page 2,3], please spell out RTP, SDP, AVPF at first use. >> -[Page 2] "simulation data" is listed as real time along with audio, video. >> I suggest removing it and putting "time critical application" if that is >> what we want to convey. >> -[Page 5], Section 5, "in the Section 3"---->"in Section 3" >> >> Best regards, >> Meral >> --- >> Meral Shirazipour >> Ericsson >> Research >> www.ericsson.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
