Thanks for this, Joel. I agree with your suggestion. Jari
On 16 Oct 2015, at 06:55, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ace-usecases-07 > ACE use cases > Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern > Review Date: 15-Oct-2015 > IETF LC End Date: 22-Oct-2015 > IESG Telechat date: 22-Oct-2015 > > Summary: This document is ready to be published as an Informational RFC. > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: > I believe ACE should be spelled out in the title. > > I am mildly concerned that some of the requirements may be undecidable or > unmeetable, such as a requirement for easily sanitizing a log to leave needed > historical information while removing personal information (U2.12). I > understand the motivation for this. But I think the document might be helped > by a warning about their being conflicting goals within or among some > requirements. > > Nits/editorial comments: N/A > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
