Thank you very much for your review, Elwyn.

I can see that the document has improved. That is the most important thing in 
our reviews. Thank you Tom and others for taking comments from this review and 
elsewhere into account. Thanks again, all.

Jari

On 03 Dec 2014, at 03:15, Elwyn Davies <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-34.txt
> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review Date: 2014-12-02
> IETF LC End Date: -
> IESG Telechat date: 2014-12-04
> 
> Summary: I have discussed extensively with the authors and have prepared -35 
> in conjunction with them which is ready for publication as a Proposed 
> Standard.
> 
> All the issues identified at last call have been fixed up in this next 
> version.
> 
> Version 34 had a couple of outstanding issues, particularly understanding of 
> how READDIR was intended  to operate in the face of modifications or 
> deletions of the target directory between calls. Text has been added to 
> s15.26.4 to clarify how servers are intended to operate and how clients may 
> have to dela with this problem.
> 
> There were also a couple of editorial issues around the anonymous and READ 
> bypass stateids plus some further editorial cleanup.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: READDIR behaviour clarified in -35
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: Various all fixed in -35
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to