I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-dot-x-22.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 2014-12-01
IETF LC End Date: -
IESG Telechat date: 2014-12-04

Summary: Ready for publication on standards track.

The issues identified in last call have been fixed and the new version is now fully consistent with
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-34 (and -35).

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
The extracted code goes through rpcgen cleanly.
However, the demo server created by rpcgen -a does not compile cleanly on machines that do not have RPC GSS-API installed due to the lack of a definition of the preprocessor symbol RPCSEC_GSS (value 6). I have suggested modifying the code to provide a fallback for machines that don't use GSS-API.
OLD:
    /// /* RPCSEC_GSS has a value of '6' - See RFC 2203 */
    /// union secinfo4 switch (uint32_t flavor) {
    ///  case RPCSEC_GSS:
    ///          rpcsec_gss_info        flavor_info;
    ///  default:
    ///          void;
    /// };
NEW:
    /// /* RPCSEC_GSS has a value of '6' - See RFC 2203 */
    /// %#ifndef RPCSEC_GSS
/// /* Workaround in case machine does not have RPC GSS-API installed */
    /// %#define RPCSEC_GSS    6        /* RPCSEC_GSS */
    /// %#endif
    /// union secinfo4 switch (uint32_t flavor) {
    ///  case RPCSEC_GSS:
    ///          rpcsec_gss_info        flavor_info;
    ///  default:
    ///          void;
    /// };

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to