-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks.
Kwok, do you feel you can handle these?
Fred
On Oct 9, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi,
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt
Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 8 October 2007
Summary:
This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
should
be fixed before publication.
Comments:
This draft is Informational and does not seem to contain any normative
text. If this is actually the case, Section 1.1 with its reference to
RFC 2119 should be removed.
A set of acronyms are not expanded. They should be expanded on their
first use.
References [1] and [2] are never used in the text.
Abstracts should not contain references.
Thanks,
Gonzalo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFHDINSbjEdbHIsm0MRAnorAKDtCg3B2UfO8xodGXevTd5xCnEQ3wCeLgTl
OfAGJ7c2VeUUx4tOdSVmR5E=
=gS72
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
