Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Review Date: 8 October 2007 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Comments: This draft is Informational and does not seem to contain any normative text. If this is actually the case, Section 1.1 with its reference to RFC 2119 should be removed. A set of acronyms are not expanded. They should be expanded on their first use. References [1] and [2] are never used in the text. Abstracts should not contain references. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
