Hi Robert, You are right, we will remove this sentence.
Regards, JL > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Robert Sparks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 6 juin 2007 07:28 > À : [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LE ROUX > Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Genart review: draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-ospf-05.txt > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team > (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, > please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call > comments you may receive. > > > Document: draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-ospf-05.txt > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 5June07 > IETF LC End Date: 6June07 > > Summary: This document is basically ready for publication as > a Proposed Standard, but has a nit that should be considered > prior to publication > > Comments: > > The draft is clearly written, complete, and appears quite > accessible to an implementer. > > nit) The introduction claims that this draft does not define > any new OSPF elements of procedure, but section 5 is titled > "Elements of Procedure" and does appear to contain some > significant behavioral requirements. Should the introduction > be modified? > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
