Hi Krishnan, As far as I probed, I can say: 1. in the "system.cpu.itb_walker_cache" and "system.cpu.dtb_walker_cache", the caches refer to TLB (instruction and data TLBs respectively). 2. The walker refers to the page table walker. 3. No page walk cache is implemented by gem5.
Best Regards, MB On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:45 PM Mahyar Samani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: krishnan gosakan via gem5-users <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 5:21 AM > Subject: [gem5-users] Need clarification on few stat fields > To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]> > Cc: krishnan gosakan <[email protected]> > > > Hi all, > I hope you all are doing well. I have a doubt concerning the stat file > generated for full system emulation. I see a lot of entries prefixed by > "system.cpu.itb_walker_cache" and "system.cpu.dtb_walker_cache". I just > want to know what caches are these referring to. Are they referring to TLB > or Page Walk Cache? I would like to explore system performance with and > without page walk cache. So, I want to know if page walk cache is already > implemented in gem5. As far as I checked the pagetable_walker.cc, I don't > see anything relevant to this. > > -- > Regards, > Krishnan. > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s > > > -- > Mahyar Samani (he/him/his) > Electrical and Computer Engineering Department > Research Assistant at *DArchR <https://arch.cs.ucdavis.edu/> (*2235 > Kemper Hall) > Secretary > ECE-GSA > Vice President > Iranian Student Association at UC Davis > University of California, Davis >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
